Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Concordance between Laboratory and Field Methods for the Assessment of Body Fat in Olympic Combat Athletes: Analysis of the Influence of Adiposity

doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084493

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive analysis and p -values for combat sports athletes’ %BF—total and by sport—measured using laboratory and field methods.

Article Snippet: As field methods, BIA (Tanita BC-418, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA), NIR (Futrex-6100, Futrex, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and anthropometry (Seca 769 scale with stadiometer, Seca Corporation, Hamburg, Germany; Holtain caliper, anthropometric tape and anthropometer, Holtain, Crymych, UK) were used.

Techniques:

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Concordance between Laboratory and Field Methods for the Assessment of Body Fat in Olympic Combat Athletes: Analysis of the Influence of Adiposity

doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084493

Figure Lengend Snippet: Percentage of body fat mean, and individual and mean difference intraclass correlation coefficients with a 95% confidence interval for the different methods compared to DXA.

Article Snippet: As field methods, BIA (Tanita BC-418, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA), NIR (Futrex-6100, Futrex, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and anthropometry (Seca 769 scale with stadiometer, Seca Corporation, Hamburg, Germany; Holtain caliper, anthropometric tape and anthropometer, Holtain, Crymych, UK) were used.

Techniques:

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Concordance between Laboratory and Field Methods for the Assessment of Body Fat in Olympic Combat Athletes: Analysis of the Influence of Adiposity

doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084493

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots representing the difference between DXA-derived %BF and %BF determined using ( a ) anthropometry, ( b ) BOD POD, ( c ) NIR and ( d ) BIA. The central dotted line represents the mean inter-methods difference. The upper and lower broken lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (inter-methods difference ± 1.96 SD of the differences). Abbreviations: %BF = percentage of body fat; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; BOD POD = air displacement plethysmography; NIR = near-infrared interactance; BIA = bioelectrical impedance analysis; SD = standard deviation.

Article Snippet: As field methods, BIA (Tanita BC-418, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA), NIR (Futrex-6100, Futrex, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and anthropometry (Seca 769 scale with stadiometer, Seca Corporation, Hamburg, Germany; Holtain caliper, anthropometric tape and anthropometer, Holtain, Crymych, UK) were used.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Standard Deviation

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Concordance between Laboratory and Field Methods for the Assessment of Body Fat in Olympic Combat Athletes: Analysis of the Influence of Adiposity

doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084493

Figure Lengend Snippet: Forest plot: ICC (crude) and 95% confidence interval for the relationship between BMI and %BF (measured by BOD POD, BIA, NIR, and anthropometry) by subgroups (sport) or tertiles (%BF measured by DXA and weight). Abbreviations: ICC = intra-class correlation; CI = confidence interval; BMI = body mass index; %BF = percentage of body fat; BOD POD = air displacement plethysmography; NIR = near-infrared interactance; BIA = bioelectrical impedance analysis; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Article Snippet: As field methods, BIA (Tanita BC-418, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA), NIR (Futrex-6100, Futrex, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and anthropometry (Seca 769 scale with stadiometer, Seca Corporation, Hamburg, Germany; Holtain caliper, anthropometric tape and anthropometer, Holtain, Crymych, UK) were used.

Techniques: